April 21, 2026 Bible Study — Act So That the Peoples of All Nations May Know That the Lord Is God

Today, I am reading and commenting on 1 Kings 8.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

I want to start by commenting on verse eight and nine where it says that the poles used to carry the ark of the covenant into the temple could be seen from the Holy Place and that they were “there to this day,” and that only the two tablets of stone containing the Laws of Moses were inside the ark.   Now in Exodus it told us that a jar of manna was put inside the ark, and then, after Korah’s revolt in Numbers, Aaron’s staff was put into the ark.  I want to highlight this because some people claim that the Book of Exodus and the Book of 1 Kings was written during the Babylonian Exile.  These verses create two problems for that theory.  First, I do not believe that the writer would have written the part about the poles being “there to this day” if he was writing after Jerusalem had been sacked.  Second it seems unlikely that someone writing this book down for the first time would write sometime in the distant past some of the things which had been put in the ark had been lost (I want to note that the Babylonian Exile was farther in the future from Solomon building the temple than we are today from the signing of the U.S. Declaration of Independence).  In fact, the writer seems to be explaining that one should not by surprised to discover that only the stone tablets remained because the other things were already gone when the ark was placed in the temple.  Which tells me that this book was written before the Babylonians destroyed Solomon’s temple.

I am now going to comment on what Solomon said during his dedication of the temple, both in his prayer of dedication and what he said to the people.  There are two points which Solomon makes that I want to highlight.  First, Solomon tells us that we can only expect God to answer our prayers if we repent of our sins.  I want to emphasize that repent means to regret and turn from sins.  It is not enough to say that we did wrong, to confess our sins.  We need to try to change ourselves so that we do not commit those sins again.  Second, Solomon said that God’s people need to act so that all the peoples of the earth may know that the Lord is God and there is no other.  I believe that Solomon is telling the people of Israel to essentially the same thing that Jesus commanded at the end of the Gospel according to Matthew when He told us go and make disciples of all nations, teaching them to observe all that He commanded us.  Solomon was telling the people of Israel to show all nations that the Lord is God and that they should do observe His commands.

 

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

 

April 20, 2026 Bible Study — Be Careful Spending More Time on Your Own Wants and Needs Than You Spend on Serving and Worshiping God

Today, I am reading and commenting on 1 Kings 7.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

So, in yesterday’s passage it told us that it took Solomon seven years to build the temple.  In today’s passage it tells us that it took him thirteen years to build his own house.  On the one hand, it seems wrong that Solomon spent twice as long on building a house for himself as he spent building a house for God.  On the other hand, the way I read this passage, the house that Solomon built for himself had four separate parts.  Each of which served a separate purpose.  There was the House of the Forest of Lebanon, the Hall of Pillars, the Hall of the Throne, and then Solomon’s living quarters.  The first two were for dealing with various dignitaries, both foreign and domestic. The third was where Solomon held court and gave judgement in court cases.  Finally, it is not clear to me whether or not the house for Pharaoh’s daughter was considered part of the house which it took Solomon thirteen years to build, or if it was a separate building project.  So, while Solomon had justifications for spending more time building his own house than he did on building a house for God, doing so started him down the path away from God.  By allowing himself to justify more time and effort upon himself, Solomon failed to focus on serving God and doing God’s will.  We need to pay attention to what we spend our time on.  Solomon justified to himself spending more time on his own desires and needs than he spent on worshiping and serving God.  This led him down a path which led him further and further from God.  We need to be careful not to fall into the same trap.  We need to seek ways in which we can worship and serve God while doing the other things we need to do so that we do not spend more time on ourselves than we spend on God.  That is a challenge I am struggling with in my life right now…and until I wrote this Bible study I had not even realized it.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

April 19, 2026 Bible Study — Solomon’s Officials

Today, I am reading and commenting on 1 Kings 4-6.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

Wow, that was a tough read, reading some of those names out loud really challenged me.  On the other hand, as I said shortly after I started making a video of me reading the Scripture for my Bible study every day, reading it out loud really helps me pay attention on parts which I generally find little of interest in, such as the detailed description of who Solomon’s officials were.  It says here that Zadok and Abiathar were priests.  Yet in yesterday’s passage it tells us that Solomon expelled Abiathar from being a priest.  Hopefully you can understand that this is not a contradiction.  Because in that same list of Solomon’s officials it says that Azariah the son of Zadok was the priest, and that Zabud the son of Nathan was priest.  That means that at the beginning of Solomon’s reign Zadok and Abiathar were the priests.  At a later point in Solomon’s reign, Zadok’s son was priest and Nathan’s son was also the priest.  I do not think we can tell whether Abiathar’s son and Nathan’s son were priests at the same time or not.  It would certainly be consistent to believe that Zabud, Nathan’s son became priest alongside Zadok when Abiathar was expelled from the priesthood, and then continued to serve as priest when Ahaziah, Zadok’s son, succeeded his father as priest.  I mention this because there are other places in the Bible where someone is mentioned as having a role which seems to contradict what is said elsewhere about who had that role.

One example of this is Mark 2:26 (I have linked to the entire story so you can see the context) where Jesus refers to when David was fleeing King Saul and came to Ahimelech.  In that passage Jesus says that David “entered the house of God, in the time of Abiathar the high priest.”  Some people say, “But the high priest in that story was Ahimelech, Abiathar’s father.  How can Jesus be God if He mistakes Abiathar for Ahimelech?”  My answer to that is this.  Abiathar was alive when David did that, which means that it was in the time of Abiathar.  Abiathar was also later the high priest.  We often speak in this manner.  We might say, “When President George H.W. Bush was a fighter pilot.”  When George H.W. Bush was a fighter pilot, someone else was the President of the United States, but no one would say I was wrong for saying what I wrote about him.  So, Jesus was not wrong, David ate the bread of the presence in the time of Abiathar.  I am just using this story as an example of ways in which a biblical passage might refer to things which a casual reader might think was a contradiction, but is not.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

April 18, 2026 Bible Study — Solomon Knew That the Woman Willing to Sacrifice Her Own Desires Was the Mother

Today, I am reading and commenting on 1 Kings 2-3.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

I am going to start writing about Solomon’s judgement in the case of which woman was the mother of the child.  When I was first exposed to Solomon’s judgement in this passage it was explained to me that Solomon made this decision because he understood that the child’s biological mother would do anything to save her child, even giving it up to be raised as another woman’s son.  However, as I have gotten older I have realized that this is not necessarily true.  I have known several mothers who were willing to sacrifice the well-being of their child in order to satisfy their desires.  Further, I have heard and read of many more such situations.  And that is when I realized that Solomon’s wisdom far exceeded what was attributed to him by that first explanation I was given.  When Solomon said that the woman who was willing to give up the child in order to save the child’s life was the mother, he was saying that she was the woman who demonstrated motherly love towards the child.  Solomon did not give two tosses for who the child’s biological mother was.  He made his judgement based on who would look out for the child’s best interests, an who would raise the child best.  Solomon’s decision was not based on deciding who was the child’s actual biological mother.  It was based on determining which woman would sacrifice her desires in order to achieve what she believed in her heart was in the best interest of the child.  I want to note that even though Solomon’s judgement did not determine which of the women was the biological mother, most of the time the woman who chooses to sacrifice her interests for the sake of the child will be the biological mother.

I want to note that the child’s true parents, in the sense of the above commentary, may not do what you or I think is in the best interest of the child, but they will do what they believe in their heart is in the best interest of their children.

When I started writing I was debating whether I would go back and review other parts of this passage.  I have decided that I will conclude here.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

 

April 17, 2026 Bible Study — He Who Exalts Himself Will Be Humbled

Today, I am reading and commenting on 1 Kings 1.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

I have previously said that David was not a good father, at least not for his oldest sons.  My basis for that is the account of how he dealt with Amnon after Amnon raped his half-sister, Tamar., but also what it says here.  Here it says that David never confronted Adonijah for misbehavior.  The biblical account tells us that Amnon, Absalom, and Adonijah were spoiled.  So, when Adonijah saw that David’s health was failing, he thought that he could make himself the de facto king.  Abiathar and Joab went along with him in doing so.  I am going to make a guess here that David had refused to make an official pronouncement about which of his sons would be king after him and that Joab and Abiathar were afraid that there would be a civil war if David died without doing so.  I also think that the men among David’s advisors who refused to go along with him thought that he would make a bad king.  It appears to me that Adonijah intended to do something similar to what Absalom had done, except without the plan to kill David.  Adonijah intended to get himself made king in David’s place by acclamation of all Israel.  Then he would just set his father David aside, or perhaps rule as regent until David died of natural causes.

I always wonder if David had really promised Bathsheba that Solomon would be king after him, because nowhere before this is that mentioned.  However, the fact that Adonijah invited all of David’s other living sons to join his coronation feast tells us that there was at least a common understanding among David’s court that David intended Solomon to be his heir.   In any case, all that I have written so far brings me to my lesson from today’s passage.  We should not exalt ourselves, but rather let others do that.  We should not seek the positions of honor.  If we are worthy of honor, others will give us that honor.  I am reminded here of what Jesus said in Luke 14 where He tells us to sit in least honored seat so that the host may tell us to move to a more honored seat.  Because Solomon did not seek to me made king, his support after he was crowned was stronger than that of Adonijah.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

 

April 16, 2026 Bible Study — Choosing to Fall Into the Hands of God

Today, I am reading and commenting on 2 Samuel 23-24.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

Today’s passage begins with what the writer says are the last words of David.  It always seemed strange to me that the last words David spoke were such a carefully crafted psalm.  Then it occurred to me that what the writer likely means is that these were the words David wrote as his last words to be spoken after his death as a reminder to the people of Israel about his faith in God, and the faith which they should have in God.  So, we are not to understand this as the very last words David spoke before he took his last breath.  Rather, we are to understand that these were the words which David composed to be read after his death.

I find the listing of David’s mighty men interesting, but I am going to skip over that today and go to the account given here about David’s census.  The writer says that God’s anger was kindled against Israel, so God put the idea into David’s mind to take a census of Israel and Judah.  Joab tried to talk David out of it, but David was king, so his word carried the day.  The passage does not tell us why God was angry with Israel, just that He was.  When David realized that he had done wrong by ordering this census to be taken, he repented of his sin and prayed to God begging forgiveness.  God sent the prophet Gad to offer David three possible consequences.  David’s answer is interesting.  Rather than explicitly choose one of the options David said, “Let us fall into the hand of the Lord,…,but let me not fall into the hand of man.”  I find it interesting that David said that considering what the writer of the Book of Hebrews wrote,“It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.” I think it unlikely that the writer of Hebrews was not explicitly thinking about what David said here when he wrote that.  So, while it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God, it is still better than if He allows us to fall into the hands of men.  I would rather suffer what God thinks I deserve for my sins than what human beings think I deserve.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

April 15, 2026 Bible Study — Where Does Our Righteousness Come From?

Today, I am reading and commenting on 2 Samuel 20-22.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

After describing the war against Sheba the writer summarizes those officials who were closest to David.  After that he lists events in no particular time order.  For example, we do not know if the incident with the Gibeonites occurred before or after Absalom’s rebellion.  The same is true of the wars against the Philistines.  We don’t know if those were before or after Absalom rebelled.  For that matter, we do not know if the incident where Abishai saved David’s life occurred before or after the incident with Bathsheba.  I bring it up because it is one of several examples throughout these accounts about the debt which David owed to his nephews Abishai and Joab.  Despite his repeated frustrations with them, Joab and Abishai served David well for most of his life.

However, I want to focus on the song of David recorded here.  I love the images David draws with his words.  They make me wish I had the talent to produce illustrations.  They evoke powerful and awe inspiring images in my mind.  The first couple of lines makes me see a castle on the side of a cliff overlooking the sea, with waves crashing against the base of the cliff.  David writes, “I call upon the Lord,…, and I am saved from my enemies.”  And then he writes, “In my distress I called upon the Lord; to my God I called. From His temple He heard my voice, and my cry came to His ears.”  Both of those speak of how God may seem far away, but He will respond to our cries out of His love.  Then David writes a series of lines which tell us how God’s anger over the abuse of those He loves causes earth and heaven to tremble.  How He marshals the forces of nature to come to those who rely on Him in trouble and save them.

All of that strikes me every time I read this passage, but today I saw something else, but at first it bothered me.  After those wonderful images, David writes, “The Lord has dealt with me according to my righteousness:…”  He says that in a couple of different ways, implying that God saved him because he was such a good man.  Which seems to run contrary to the teaching found elsewhere in the Bible that none are righteous, that all have sinned.  He then talks about how God shows His goodness in response to our goodness and shows Himself two steps ahead of those who think to outsmart Him.  Then David comes to the part which makes it make sense.  David writes that God is a shield for those who take refuge in Him and that it was God who made his way blameless.  David tells us that the righteousness which he ascribes as the reason God saved him was a gift from God Himself.  David was not righteous because he was better than others, David was not righteous because he did not sin.  David was righteous because God made him righteous.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

April 14, 2026 Bible Study — Setting Aside Our Personal Feelings for the Good of Others

Today, I am reading and commenting on 2 Samuel 18-19.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

When David learned that Absalom had been killed, he went into a room and wept.  As his warriors returned from battle and learned that he was in mourning for Absalom, they came into the city quietly rather than rejoicing over their victory.  Joab pointed out to David that by doing so David was communicating that those who had fought for him ought to be ashamed for being happy that they had lived.  Further, Joab told David that if his men had failed to defeat Absalom, the rest of David’s sons would have been killed, as would have David’s wives.  If Absalom had won everyone else David loved would have died.  David needed to put aside his personal feelings for the good of those who had supported him.  We need to be willing to do likewise.  We need to be willing to put aside our personal feelings for the good of others.

I had mentioned in yesterday’s study that what Ziba told David about Mephibosheth when David was fleeing Jerusalem was not consistent with what Mephibosheth said upon David’s return.  I misspoke partially when I said that we are not given any basis to know who was telling the true story.  In today’s passage the writer tells us that Mephibosheth had not taken care of himself from the time David had fled Jerusalem until he returned.  That suggests that Mephibosheth was genuinely distraught by Absalom’s coup and the danger which David was in.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

 

April 13, 2026 Bible Study — David Refuses to Succumb to Anger

Today, I am reading and commenting on 2 Samuel 16-17.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

I am always struck by Ziba’s conversation with David.  I know from having read this passage and those which follows repeatedly that when David returns after defeating Absalom Mephibosheth denies what Ziba says about him here.  We are never given any basis to figure out which one lied and which one told the truth.  Which brings me to my thought, why did ZIba say what he did about Mephibosheth?  Did Mephibosheth actually say what Ziba claimed he said?  Or, was ZIba merely taking advantage of the situation to ingratiate himself to David?  If the latter, why did he not instead attempt to ingratiate himself with Absalom?  Perhaps, Mephibosheth did something which Ziba misinterpreted to meaning what he said to David.  I will note that Ziba’s contribution was important to David’s eventual success against Absalom.  Without the food and donkey’s which Ziba brought, David’s forces would have been weakened and slowed down.  If they had been slowed down, Absalom’s forces may have overtaken them.

I sort of feel sorry for Abishai, David’s nephew.  He was offended by Shimei cursing the king, the Lord’s anointed.  I think he was applying here the lesson he had learned from his experience when he accompanied David into King Saul’s camp while Saul was hunting David.  On that occasion, David refused to allow him to kill King Saul because King Saul was God’s anointed.  Here, Abishai thought Shimei deserved to die for cursing God’s anointed.  David was angry with Abishai because Abishai thought the solution to every problem was to kill someone (oversimplifying a bit by saying that).  David knew that God was having Shimei curse him for a reason.  So, he remained humble and did not allow Abishai to kill him.  Perhaps, David’s problem with Abishai and Joab was that they tempted him to lose his humility and vent his anger.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

April 12, 2026 Bible Study — The Significance of the Mount of Olives

Today, I am reading and commenting on 2 Samuel 14-15.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

I am going to start writing about when David was fleeing from Absalom.  As he was fleeing the city the passage tells us that David went up the ascent of the Mount of Olives weeping, barefoot, and with his head covered.  David went up to the Mount of Olives in mourning.  Additionally, it tells us that God was worshiped on the summit of the Mount of Olives.  As I read that I made the connection to Jesus going there to pray after the Last Supper.  I had always thought that Jesus went there because it was a place where he could pray in relative privacy while He was in Jerusalem.  I had never made the connection with God being worshiped there historically by the Jews, nor with the Old Testament prophecies which referred to the Mount of Olives.   In Ezekiel, the the Mount of Olives was where the glory of the Lord stood when it left the temple and the city shortly before Jerusalem was sacked by the Babylonians. And in Zechariah, the Mount of Olives was where the Messiah would stand to fight  the nations when they battle against Jerusalem.  Here, in today’s passage.  David weeping and mourning foreshadows Jesus doing likewise the night before His crucifixion.

When I began writing I was not sure if I was going to write about anything else, but I have decided I do want to touch on another element of today’s passage.  When I read today’s passage, I wonder whether the unintentional role Joab played in enabling Absalom’s rebellion factored into David’s hostility toward Joab and his brother.  If not for Joab, David would not have brought Absalom back from exile.  Further, if Absalom had not convinced Joab to go to David on his behalf, Absalom would not have been able to charm the people of Israel to support his claim to the throne.  Joab did both of these things because he knew that David mourned his estrangement from Absalom.  However, I wonder if Joab was also thinking about the succession, about what would happen when David could no longer rule.  If perhaps Joab thought that Absalom would make a good king to follow David, or perhaps just supported him as the next king because he was David’s oldest living son.  One final point just occurred to me, although I know I have thought about it before.  I wonder if Absalom plotted his rebellion against David because he blamed his father for Amnon raping his sister Tamar, or perhaps just resented David for not punishing Amnon for it?

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.