October 18, 2026 Bible Study –Thoughts on Marriage, and How Following Jesus Changes What We Value

Today, I am reading and commenting on Mark 10-11.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

When Jesus is asked about divorce in this passage His answer addresses many more things than just divorce.  Most people see that He also addresses the nature of marriage.  He tells us that marriage is between a man and a woman and that the two of them become one flesh.  This rules out both same sex marriage and polygamy.  I think the same sex marriage part is obvious, but perhaps some people do not see why a person could not marry more than one person of the opposite sex.  I think that is rather straightforward.  The passage says that a man and a woman become one flesh.  That is a individual man and an individual woman become one flesh.  How then can  either of them become one flesh with another?

Jesus also addresses how we see the Law given by Moses. When the Pharisees told Jesus that Moses allowed a man to write a certificate of divorce and send his wife away the passage they quote was not actually a command about divorce, but rather a command about remarriage after divorce.  The passage starts by saying, “if a man writes her a certificate of divorce.”(I am paraphrasing here)  So, Moses did not tell them, “You can divorce your wife by giving her a certificate of divorce.”  Rather, Moses said, “Some of you are going to divorce your wives, when you do…”  Jesus pointed this out to the Pharisees, and to us.  We need to be careful not to read a command from God into places where God tells us what to do when we have gone against His desire.  Moses gave this command here because people were going to get divorced.  Rather than tell them that when they did so they were irreconcilably alienated from God, he gave them instructions to limit the damage they had done, both to themselves and their wife (the same principle applies in other situations and to women who divorce their husbands).

Now a little bit about the account of the rich young man.  The passage makes clear that we cannot enter into the kingdom of God on the strength of our own actions.  After Jesus says that it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God, His disciples wondered how, if that is the case, anyone could do so?  Jesus answered them that it is not possible for man, but not with God.  God makes it possible for those who accept His gift.  When Peter asked, “What about us?”  Jesus told them that everyone who has left something in order to follow Jesus will receive it back a hundredfold.  Anything you have left behind, God will give you back a hundredfold.  I don’t think Jesus meant that as literally one hundred times the houses, brothers, parents, or other things He mentions.  Rather I think He means that you will value what God gives you a hundred (or more) times what you left.  As we leave things behind to follow Jesus, our values change and we discover that what God gives us is worth much more than anything we gave up.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

October 17, 2026 Bible Study — Take Up Your Cross and Follow Jesus, Even Unto Death

Today, I am reading and commenting on Mark 8-9.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

After Peter declared that Jesus was the Christ, the Messiah, the Anointed One of God, Jesus began teaching them that He would suffer, be killed, then, after three days, rise again.  When Peter heard him say this, he took Jesus aside and rebuked Him for being negative.  I am convinced that Peter thought that Jesus was feeling like He was going to fail when He started saying those things.  Peter was convinced that the Christ would win a mighty battle over His enemies and never suffer.  In this situation, Jesus called Peter “Satan”, which means “Adversary”, because what Peter was saying was similar to the temptations which He experienced in the wilderness right after His baptism by John.  Peter was telling Jesus that He did not need to suffer, that Jesus instead should use His power to force people to honor Him.  Once again I find myself knowing in my head what I want to say, but failing to put it into words.  I want to note that just before rebuking Peter for this, Jesus turned and saw that His disciples were watching, and, I believe, offering their support to Peter as their spokesperson.  So, Jesus’ rebuke was meant for all of them.  Jesus was telling them that their understanding of what the Christ would be was incomplete and mistaken.  In the same way, we need to recognize that God does not always work the way we expect.  It was immediately after this that Jesus taught that whoever wanted to follow Him must deny their own wants, take up their cross and follow Him.  The crowd would have understood taking up their cross to mean heading towards suffering and death.  Are we willing to take up our cross and follow Jesus?

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

 

October 16, 2026 Bible Study — Doing Not Just What God Says, But What He Means

Today, I am reading and commenting on Mark 6-7.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

It struck me today that, in Mark’s account of the feeding of the five thousand, when Jesus asked His disciples how many loaves they had, they responded by telling Him that they had five loaves and two fish. Why did that strike me?  Because Jesus did not ask them how much food they had.  He asked them specifically how many loaves they had.  However, His disciples understood that He meant how much food did they have, and they answered that question.  They didn’t take Jesus’ question strictly literally.  They didn’t limit their answer just to the loaves of bread they had, even though that was what He asked them about.  They paid attention to the context, which was, “how do we feed all of these people?”  When Jesus asked them, they actually took some time to consult among themselves to determine how much food they had.  In the same way, when we are called to a task and do not think that we have the resources to accomplish it, we should consult among ourselves to determine ALL of the resources we have that we can possibly use for the task.  Then, we should give those resources into God’s hands and begin the work to which He has called us.  In particular, I am thinking of those who think that we should delegate God’s call to us to care for the sick and the poor to the government because “the Church doesn’t have enough resources to address the problem.”  Perhaps it is time we stopped thinking that government programs will answer the need and start working on doing it ourselves. I want to note that I know there are Christian organizations who are following this principle, but I also know there are many Christians who think that the answer to suffering is more government action.  What I am saying is that when we see a problem which we feel God is calling us to address that we should strive to address it directly, not by delegating the answer to the government, or even to some large impersonal group.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

October 15, 2026 Bible Study — The Disciples Begin to Realize That Jesus Is God

Today, I am reading and commenting on Mark 4-5.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

I recently realized that the account of Jesus calming the storm shows us multiple things.  First, it is told as a deliberate parallel to the story of Jonah.  In the Book of Jonah, Jonah was asleep in the ship while the storm raged all about it and only woke up when the captain of the ship deliberately woke him.  Here, Jesus was asleep and only woke up when His disciples deliberately woke Him.  The reason Mark includes this parallel is because Jesus later refers to this generation being given the “sign of Jonah”, referring to Jonah being in the belly of the fish for three days.  The next thing for us to see is a contrast to the story of Jonah, and I think that contrast is important.  In the account of Jonah, the sea was only calmed after Jonah was thrown overboard…and it was calmed by God.  Here Jesus calms the storm, going from the role of Jonah (sleeping through the storm until awoken by someone) to the role of God (calming the storm).  Even without being a parallel to the Book of Jonah, Jesus calming the storm was a sign that He was God.  I believe that Jesus’ disciples first realized that Jesus was not just a human anointed by God, but actually God, during this event.  The Old Testament repeatedly tells us that only God can control storms and calm the sea.  So, when Jesus did so, the disciples began to realize that He was God.  The question they asked themselves indicate that they did not truly believe that He was God yet, but it shows that the idea began to enter their minds.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

October 14, 2026 Bible Study — Jesus Called Many Disciples, But Appointed Twelve of Them to Preach

Today, I am reading and commenting on Mark 1-3.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

As I began to think about what to write, my first thought was about the fact that the man with an unclean spirit was in the synagogue when Jesus was teaching there on a Sabbath.  I thought about the superstition that exceptionally evil people and beings cannot enter a Church building.  That idea does not hold up in face of the fact that people with unclean spirits were able to enter a synagogue.  It’s not a particularly important thought, but I found it amusing.  Next I am going to point out that in chapter three verses thirteen and fourteen, we see it explicitly pointed out that Jesus called more to follow Him than just the Twelve Apostles.  I point this out because too often when we refer to Jesus’ disciples we think of only the Twelve.  I even hear Christian apologists make this mistake.  They talk about the early Church as if only the Twelve heard everything Jesus preached.  The Twelve were those whom Jesus called in order to send them out to preach.  I just realized the importance of what that tells us.  Jesus called many to be His disciples, but it was the Twelve whom He selected to send out to preach.  In the same way, in the Church today, many of have been called, but only some have been selected by Christ to be sent out to preach.  So, we should not think that just because we have been called to be Jesus’ disciple that we are sent to preach.  Perhaps we only have a support role.  Of course, we see in Acts that Matthias, who was originally was called to a support role, was later sent out to preach, and Stephen who was called to a support role (the seven Deacons were explicitly called to a support role) also preached.  Do not feel like you are failing Christ because you have a support role.  However, just because your primary role is support do not think that the Spirit will not inspire you to preach when He decides that is what He wants from you.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

October 13, 2026 Bible Study — Human Nature Has Not Changed

Today, I am reading and commenting on  Matthew 27-28.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

When Judas returned the thirty pieces of silver, the chief priests acknowledged that they had been in the wrong by giving it to Judas in the first place when they called it “blood money”.  Not only that, but Matthew suggests that it was commonly understood that they had done so by the fact that the field they bought with the money was known as the “Field of Blood.”  From there I want to look at the fact that the “crowd” chose the release of the violent, destructive man, Barabbas over the release of the innocent man, Jesus.  They did not do this entirely on their own.  The chief priests and the religious leaders stirred them up to do so.  Barabbas was not a person who elicited sympathy.  Matthew calls Barabbas “notorious”, and Pilate was clearly looking for someone he thought the people would desire to see killed.  My point being that we see crowds doing the same sort of thing today, being stirred up to seek the release of people who have done things most people, in most circumstances, would view as horrendous.  Usually, we see this happening to advance the political interests of those stirring up the crowg.  Pilate gave into the crowds to prevent riots.  Today, we see people riot when innocent people are not sacrificed to their anger.  This shows us that human nature has not changed in two thousand years.  Human nature has not changed since Cain killed Abel.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

October 12, 2026 Bible Study — Thoughts About the Man Who Provided the Space for the Last Supper

Today, I am reading and commenting on Matthew 25-26.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

The first thing which stood out to me in today’s passage was that when His disciples asked Jesus where He wanted them to prepare for Him to ear the Passover, He told them to go to a “certain man.”  What stood out to me is that Matthew was one of the disciples whom Jesus told to go to that “certain man.”  Which made me wonder why Matthew did not use the man’s name here. The first explanation I thought of is that the man still owned the house in Jerusalem and Matthew did not want to expose the man to being identified as a follower of Jesus.  That would mean that Matthew wrote this Gospel before 70 A.D. and the destruction of the temple.  Another explanation would be that Matthew had forgotten the man’s name.  That is simple and easy, but seems improbable unless the man was not one of those who continued to have faith in Jesus after His resurrection (probably because he refused to accept the idea that Jesus resurrected).  It seems to me to be unlikely that the man who provided the space for Jesus to eat His last Passover meal would fail to believe that He rose from the dead.  The final possible explanation I can think of is that the man had died within a few years of Jesus’ resurrection and Matthew did not consider that his name would add anything to the story.  Personally, I lean towards the first explanation, that the Gospel According to Matthew was written before 70 A.D., to be the most likely.

There is a lot more to be thought about in this passage, I hope you read it today.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

October 11, 2026 Bible Study — Hypocrisy Is Acting Like You’re Righteous in Public While Not Even Trying in Private

Today, I am reading and commenting on Matthew 23-24.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

I want to start by noting that the Greek word Matthew uses when he writes that Jesus called the scribes and Pharisees hypocrites can also be translated as “actors”.  When I learned that it gave me an insight into what being a hypocrite means in a way I had not previously understood.  At first, I wished that the translators had used the word “actors” instead of hypocrite because we associate hypocrite with having inconsistency between what we do and what we say we believe.  However, I realized that if the translators had used the word “actors” instead of “hypocrites” many people would have thought that acting in plays and videos was wrong.  When Jesus calls the scribes and Pharisees hypocrites He is not condemning them for discrepancies between what they say they believe and what they do.  He condemns them for acting so as to appear righteous in public, but privately behaving differently.  The sin of hypocrisy is not failing to live up to the standard which you proclaim.  Hypocrisy is doing things to make it look like you live up to the standard you preach without actually trying to live up to it.  I want to repeat that it is not hypocritical to fail to live up to the standard you preach.  Hypocrisy is condemning others for failing to live up to a standard which you fail to maintain.  Jesus actually points out a great example of hypocrisy when He points out how the scribes and Pharisees make a big production out of tithing from the harvest of their herbs, in order to make it seem like they are detailed oriented in keeping the Law, while at the same time using the system to take advantage of the poor and powerless.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

 

October 10, 2026 Bible Study — Do Not Bother to Answer Those Who Will Not Accept Any Answer

Today, I am reading and commenting on Matthew 21-22.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

I love all of Jesus’ interactions in today’s passage so much that I wasn’t sure where to start.  However, Jesus’ reaction when the chief priests asked Him what authority He had to do the things He had done, particularly I believe clearing the merchants out of the temple.  He responded by asking them whether John’s baptism came from heaven or from man.  This was a test which revealed their insincerity.  We need to pay attention to what Jesus did here.  Previously when He was asked similar questions Jesus had given answers for the sake of His disciples and of the crowds.  This time Jesus answered differently so as to show the crowds that those asking were insincere in their question.  The people had seen what Jesus did and wished that they had the guts to do similarly.  The religious leaders had asked Jesus this question in order to make Him seem like either a megalomaniac or just a rabble rouser trying to stir up trouble.  Their unwillingness to answer Jesus’ question revealed that no matter how He answered their question, they would not accept His answer.  In the same way today, we need to recognize that many of those who ask us to provide evidence for Jesus being God will not accept our answer no matter what we say.  Before we try to answer those who ask for evidence for Jesus’ resurrection, or for the existence of God, we need to ask them what evidence they will accept.  If the answer is that they will not accept any evidence for those things, we should not spend time trying to provide it.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

 

October 9, 2026 Bible Study — We Must Be Childlike and Humble to Enter Heaven

Today, I am reading and commenting on Matthew 18-20.

I have a Youtube video of me reading the Scripture passage and my comments. Please check it out and let me know your thoughts.

Also, here is the link for my Patreon page

Today’s passage begins with the disciples asking Jesus who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.  Jesus called a child and told them that unless we turn and become like children, we will not enter the kingdom of heaven and in order to be the greatest in the kingdom of heaven we must humble ourselves like the child He had put in the middle of a group of adults.  Later in today’s passage we have another example of Jesus’ interaction with children.  There some parents brought some children to Jesus for Him to lay His hands on them and pray over them.  The disciples rebuked the parents for taking up Jesus’ time, but Jesus called for the children to be brought to Him.  This is a lesson about the importance of teaching children about God, but also about taking time to pay attention to children.

Right after that second teaching by Jesus about the importance of children we have another teaching about entering the kingdom of heaven.  A man came up to Jesus asking what good deed he must do in order to have eternal life.  Jesus tells him to keep the commandments.  The man pushes to know which commandments and Jesus answers by listing a few, which the man immediately claims to have kept.  However, he clearly still feels like he is lacking something.  Jesus tells him that if he feels like he needs to do more he should sell all of his possessions, give the proceeds to the poor, and come, follow Jesus.  Giving all he has to the poor will be to store up treasure in heaven, but in order to get to heaven he would need to follow Jesus.  The man went away, unwilling to give up his wealth.  Jesus points out that it is so hard for a wealthy man to enter heaven that it is humanly impossible.  His disciples realize that if it is hard for the wealthy, it is even harder for those who are not wealthy.  Jesus tells them that it is indeed impossible for anyone to enter heaven on their own merits.  It is only by the grace of God that anyone can enter heaven.

Because God has done so much for us, let us, like little children, give all that we have to helping others.  Just as God saw us and gave His Son for us, let us see others and do what little we can for them.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.