Today, I am reading and commenting on  2 Samuel 18-19.

After the death of Absalom the people of Israel debated whether or not to invite David to come back as king over Israel.  The debate appears to have been between those who wanted to call David back to resume being king and those who wished some other solution.  David resolved the issue by reaching out to the leaders of the tribe of Judah through the priests who had remained loyal to him.  As part of his campaign to regain the support of the tribe of Judah, David offered Amasa, who had been commander of Absalom’s army, the title of commander of his army in place of Joab.  David did this despite, or maybe because of, the fact that Joab had saved him from himself by forcing him out of his funk over the death of Absalom.  I am not sure if it has any significance, but Shimei is identified as a member of the tribe of Benjamin, but he declared himself the first from among the tribes of Joseph to come and greet David upon his return.  So, does this mean that all of the tribes which were not part of the tribe of Judah considered themselves as tribes of Joseph?  The final element of this I want to point out is what the writer says about Mephibosheth.  The writer tells us that Mephibosheth had not taken care of his feet, nor trimmed his mustache, nor washed his clothes since David had fled Jerusalem.  All of which lends credence to Mephibosheth’s claim that he intended to join David when he fled, but was unable to do so because Ziba had left without him to curry favor with David.

The last few days I have found myself writing about the historical events, and the politics of ancient Israel, when what I really want to study are the spiritual lessons we can take from these accounts.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on  2 Samuel 16-17.

Once again I start my comments by talking about something I never noticed before.  As David left Jerusalem fleeing from Absalom’s forces he was approached by two men of the tribe of Benjamin, Ziba and Shimei.  Ziba had been a servant of the House of Saul and David made him steward of Mephibosheth’s household (Saul’s grandson).  Shimei we are told was part of clan from which King Saul came.  So, today I noticed for the first time that these two represent two factions from the tribe of Benjamin.  One faction, represented by Ziba, strongly supported King David.  The other faction, represented by Shimei, resented David for taking the kingship away from the tribe of Benjamin.  I wonder if perhaps Ziba’s comment to David about Mephibosheth here resulted from Mephibosheth “courting” the faction which opposed David’s kingship.  I think that perhaps Mephibosheth thought that ,since he was crippled and could therefore never aspire to the throne, catering to the whims of his fellow Benjaminites who looked back to the days of King Saul with nostalgia was harmless and spent time entertaining, and being entertained by members of that faction.  Ziba concluded that Mephibosheth would welcome Absalom’s coup, perhaps even believed that Mephibosheth thought he might be made king in the turmoil which followed.  In a way, the differences between Ziba and Shimei illustrate why Absalom’s coup failed.  Ziba brought provisions for King David and his men as they fled Jerusalem.  Shimei merely offered insults.  Later in the passage several more prominent citizens who provided provisions to David’s forces are mentioned.  Absalom had sought to garner support from the common people but failed to undermine support for David among those who had the ability to get things done.

And once again I have to say that I really thought this was going somewhere very meaningful, but it never seemed to come together.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on  2 Samuel 14-15.

As I read today’s passage I find myself thinking about several questions.  First, I wonder when Absalom began plotting his coup.  Did he begin plotting as soon as King David called him back from exile?  It appears to me that Absalom had begun plotting a coup when he reached out to Joab to enlist Joab’s aid in being allowed to leave his own estate.  Which raises the question in my mind as to what degree Joab was aware of Absalom’s efforts to become king and to what degree he approved of them?  From there I wonder whether Joab would have thrown his support behind Absalom if Absalom had asked for it?  If the answer to that question is “yes”, then Absalom’s failure to ask for Joab’s support was his first mistake.  As I think about it, I conclude that Joab would not have thrown his support behind Absalom.  If Joab would have been willing to support Absalom’s coup, Absalom would not have needed to burn Joab’s fields to get Joab to listen to him.  In another vein, I wonder as I read this if Absalom plotted to overthrow his father because he blamed David for Amnon raping his sister, or perhaps just for David’s failure to punish Amnon for that rape.

The final point I want to touch on is not a question, but a thought about why Absalom failed.  Absalom has a strategy for getting the people to back him once he had overthrown his father.  The passage describes how he had ingratiated himself with the common people.  However, the description of what happened when David fled Jerusalem illustrates Absalom’s miscalculation.  I have already touched on Absalom’s failure to get Joab’s backing for his coup, but he apparently failed to gather support from any of the other power bases of the kingdom (If I remember I may compare how those power bases split differently when I read the passage about Solomon becoming king).   First the writer highlights how the elite soldiers of King David’s army remain loyal by pointing out how a unit of Philistine mercenaries went with David into exile.  Additionally, Absalom had failed to gather any support from among the priestly caste.  The whole account of Absalom’s coup indicates that while King David had done a good job of gaining the backing of those who controlled the levers of power in Israel, he had left the rest feeling left out.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on  2 Samuel 12-13.

I think that King David gives us a great example on how we should approach sickness and death in our loved ones from the way he reacts to the sickness and death of the son he had through his adulterous affair with Bathsheba.  When the boy got sick, David fasted, mourned, and prayed to God for the boy’s recovery.  Yet, once the boy died, David resumed his normal life and did not mourn any longer.  In other words, David expressed his love for the child while he lived, when it mattered to the child, but got on with his life once the child had died.  In the same way, we should express our love for others while they are alive, when they can appreciate it, rather than waste our time mourning for them when they have died and can no longer experience how much they meant to us.  I am not saying that it is wrong to mourn, just that we should put more effort into expressing our love while those we love are alive than in doing so after their death.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on  2 Samuel 8-11.

When I read about King David’s conquests of the surrounding kingdoms I debate in my head between two theories I have about what he was doing.  The one that came to me is that King David was protecting the merchant caravans, similar to the way he had protected Nabal’s shepherds when he was on the run from King Saul.  In that theory, the neighboring kingdoms profited from raiding merchant caravans.  My second theory is that, instead, David conquered the surrounding lands in order to seize control of the caravan routes as far as he could.  I think the first theory better explains why he did not attack the Ammonites until they provoked him.

Today was the first time that it occurred to me that the reason that King David did not lead his army against the Ammonites was that the war against the Ammonites was not part of the strategy that led him to conquer his other neighbors.  In any case, staying home while he sent the army out to fight was a mistake, perhaps even a sin.  I believe that the writer of this passage felt the same way.  He expresses his judgement on King David for not leading his army by writing, “In the spring, at the time when kings go off to war, David sent Joab out…”  The writer follows that up with recording Uriah’s reason for not going home to his wife.  All of this leads me to my main point on this: if King David had been doing what he ought to have been doing, leading his army in war, he would not have been tempted to do, and thus would not have done it, what he should not have done, sleeping with another man’s wife.  In the same way, if we fill our time with doing the things which we ought to be doing, the things which God desires us to do, we will not fall into temptation

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on  1 Samuel 28-31.

After the second time David had a close encounter with King Saul when Saul was pursuing him, David decided to take his men over and enter into the service of the Philistine king of Gath, Achish.  This was second time David went to the king of Gath to join his service.  The first time David was alone and pretended to be crazy to avoid being killed.  This time David had a force of 600 loyal men following him, giving him protection.  We read in yesterday’s passage that David went to a lot of effort to convince Achish that he was raiding Israelite towns and villages, when he was not actually doing so.  As a result, when the Philistines went to war against King Saul, Achish asked David to accompany him and planned to give him a position of great importance in his order of battle.  However, the other Philistine rulers feared that David would do what the Israelite mercenaries in their army had done in their first battle against King Saul many years earlier and insisted that Achish not include David in his order of battle.

We do not know what David intended to do had Achish included him in his order of battle, but we see how God worked to keep David from going into battle against his own people.  God also worked to send David and his men back to their village in time to rescue their families, who had been taken captive by a raiding party while they were with the Philistine army.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on  1 Samuel 25-27.

Usually when I read today’s passage I focus on David’s encounter with Nabal and Abigail.  Today I want to focus on David’s refusal a second time to take King Saul’s life.  On both occasions when David refused to take King Saul’s life he did so for the same reason, Saul was God’s anointed king over Israel.  He did this despite the fact that Samuel had anointed him to take Saul’s place as king over Israel.  However, despite Saul’s promise that he would not harm David, David knew that it was just a matter of time until King Saul set forth once more with his army to kill David and his men.   We can take a lesson here on respect for those whom God has put into positions of political authority.  David refused to take any action against King Saul because God had made Saul king.  David did this despite having been chosen by God to replace Saul as king.  David honored Saul as king until God removed him from the throne.  We should have a similar respect for those whom God has placed in positions of authority over us, even those who fail to honor God.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.