Today, I am reading and commenting on  2 Samuel 23-24.

I enjoy reading here about some of the exploits of David’s mighty men.  I also often struggle to understand what sin King David had committed by ordering the census of Israel (the passage never clearly tells us what that sin was).  I even find the accounts about how David chose the site on which he built an altar of interest.  However, I want to focus on what the passage records as David’s last words (I suspect that the writer here does not mean what we usually mean by “last words”).   David tells us that a one who rules with righteousness is like the light of the dawn, or that of the sun breaking through the clouds after a storm.  Those who govern in fear of God bring forth growth like the sun breaking forth after spring rains.   If one seeks to govern with righteousness, one needs to reveal that which is hidden just as the sun at dawn does.  Then he tells us that evil men will be cast aside like thorns, which are burned where they lie.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on  2 Samuel 18-19.

After the death of Absalom the people of Israel debated whether or not to invite David to come back as king over Israel.  The debate appears to have been between those who wanted to call David back to resume being king and those who wished some other solution.  David resolved the issue by reaching out to the leaders of the tribe of Judah through the priests who had remained loyal to him.  As part of his campaign to regain the support of the tribe of Judah, David offered Amasa, who had been commander of Absalom’s army, the title of commander of his army in place of Joab.  David did this despite, or maybe because of, the fact that Joab had saved him from himself by forcing him out of his funk over the death of Absalom.  I am not sure if it has any significance, but Shimei is identified as a member of the tribe of Benjamin, but he declared himself the first from among the tribes of Joseph to come and greet David upon his return.  So, does this mean that all of the tribes which were not part of the tribe of Judah considered themselves as tribes of Joseph?  The final element of this I want to point out is what the writer says about Mephibosheth.  The writer tells us that Mephibosheth had not taken care of his feet, nor trimmed his mustache, nor washed his clothes since David had fled Jerusalem.  All of which lends credence to Mephibosheth’s claim that he intended to join David when he fled, but was unable to do so because Ziba had left without him to curry favor with David.

The last few days I have found myself writing about the historical events, and the politics of ancient Israel, when what I really want to study are the spiritual lessons we can take from these accounts.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on  2 Samuel 16-17.

Once again I start my comments by talking about something I never noticed before.  As David left Jerusalem fleeing from Absalom’s forces he was approached by two men of the tribe of Benjamin, Ziba and Shimei.  Ziba had been a servant of the House of Saul and David made him steward of Mephibosheth’s household (Saul’s grandson).  Shimei we are told was part of clan from which King Saul came.  So, today I noticed for the first time that these two represent two factions from the tribe of Benjamin.  One faction, represented by Ziba, strongly supported King David.  The other faction, represented by Shimei, resented David for taking the kingship away from the tribe of Benjamin.  I wonder if perhaps Ziba’s comment to David about Mephibosheth here resulted from Mephibosheth “courting” the faction which opposed David’s kingship.  I think that perhaps Mephibosheth thought that ,since he was crippled and could therefore never aspire to the throne, catering to the whims of his fellow Benjaminites who looked back to the days of King Saul with nostalgia was harmless and spent time entertaining, and being entertained by members of that faction.  Ziba concluded that Mephibosheth would welcome Absalom’s coup, perhaps even believed that Mephibosheth thought he might be made king in the turmoil which followed.  In a way, the differences between Ziba and Shimei illustrate why Absalom’s coup failed.  Ziba brought provisions for King David and his men as they fled Jerusalem.  Shimei merely offered insults.  Later in the passage several more prominent citizens who provided provisions to David’s forces are mentioned.  Absalom had sought to garner support from the common people but failed to undermine support for David among those who had the ability to get things done.

And once again I have to say that I really thought this was going somewhere very meaningful, but it never seemed to come together.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on  2 Samuel 14-15.

As I read today’s passage I find myself thinking about several questions.  First, I wonder when Absalom began plotting his coup.  Did he begin plotting as soon as King David called him back from exile?  It appears to me that Absalom had begun plotting a coup when he reached out to Joab to enlist Joab’s aid in being allowed to leave his own estate.  Which raises the question in my mind as to what degree Joab was aware of Absalom’s efforts to become king and to what degree he approved of them?  From there I wonder whether Joab would have thrown his support behind Absalom if Absalom had asked for it?  If the answer to that question is “yes”, then Absalom’s failure to ask for Joab’s support was his first mistake.  As I think about it, I conclude that Joab would not have thrown his support behind Absalom.  If Joab would have been willing to support Absalom’s coup, Absalom would not have needed to burn Joab’s fields to get Joab to listen to him.  In another vein, I wonder as I read this if Absalom plotted to overthrow his father because he blamed David for Amnon raping his sister, or perhaps just for David’s failure to punish Amnon for that rape.

The final point I want to touch on is not a question, but a thought about why Absalom failed.  Absalom has a strategy for getting the people to back him once he had overthrown his father.  The passage describes how he had ingratiated himself with the common people.  However, the description of what happened when David fled Jerusalem illustrates Absalom’s miscalculation.  I have already touched on Absalom’s failure to get Joab’s backing for his coup, but he apparently failed to gather support from any of the other power bases of the kingdom (If I remember I may compare how those power bases split differently when I read the passage about Solomon becoming king).   First the writer highlights how the elite soldiers of King David’s army remain loyal by pointing out how a unit of Philistine mercenaries went with David into exile.  Additionally, Absalom had failed to gather any support from among the priestly caste.  The whole account of Absalom’s coup indicates that while King David had done a good job of gaining the backing of those who controlled the levers of power in Israel, he had left the rest feeling left out.

I use the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.