I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Luke 23-24.

    One thing which is not clear from any of the Gospels is why Pilate was so reluctant to sentence Jesus to death. Based on what we know of the Roman administration of Jerusalem, the fact that Jesus was innocent of the charges does not seem a sufficient reason for Pilate’s behavior. I suspect that Pilate was concerned about stirring up actual rebellion by crucifying an innocent man with Jesus’ level of popularity. Pilate tried to pawn the issue off on Herod, who was initially interested but lost interest when Jesus failed to treat him as “important person” by either prophesying for him or otherwise doing something miraculous. In the end, it appears that Pilate agreed to crucify Jesus because he feared a riot if he did not.

    The way Luke recounts the women finding that Jesus’ tomb was empty highlights the fact that if Jesus’ disciples had made up the story about His resurrection that’s not how they would have told the story. When the women told the gathered disciples what they had seen the disciples all thought it sounded like nonsense. Luke lists several women who were present by name and that there were several more among the group who witnessed the empty tomb. I suspect that the three whom Luke mentions by name were his sources for this account. It seems likely that at least part of what seemed like nonsense to the disciples was the idea that Jesus had taught them that He would die and then rise from the dead. The women believed as soon as they were told that, the disciples were confused. The one closest to believing was Peter, who went to the tomb, saw that it was empty, then went home wondering what had happened. There is no way that the disciples would have had the women be the first to believe if that was not what had actually happened.

    In the account of the Road to Emmaus we have an exposition of what was likely what the disciples were thinking after the women told their story. The two disciples on the road as they recounted the events expressed their hope in the past tense. The fact that the women had reported that the tomb was empty, something confirmed by some of the men, did not put a spark back into their hope. Nor did the women telling them that angels had told them that Jesus was alive. Even with Jesus present (although they failed to recognize Him) and explaining how Scripture foretold this course of events they did not regain hope until they recognized Jesus in His breaking of bread. Luke makes a point of mentioning that Jesus ate a piece of broiled fish while the disciples watched. The resurrected Jesus was not some spiritual being without physical form. He was truly raised from the dead and consumed food in the presence of the disciples.

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Luke 21-22.

    I really like Luke’s Gospel, but I find writing this blog on it difficult because of the similarities between it and the Gospels of Matthew and Mark. So that it has only been a few weeks since I wrote on the similar passage from those Gospels, which leaves me feeling like I have already covered the message. Despite that, I think it worth looking again at Jesus’ teaching on what it takes to be great in the Kingdom of Heaven. When Jesus told the Twelve that one of them would betray Him, they began discussing how one of them could do that. This discussion morphed into an argument over who would be the greatest. It seems to me that this argument centered around which of them would have the greatest authority to tell others what to do. In the process of describing the contrast between the way the world views authority and leadership and the way God views them Jesus points out that despotic rulers in this world often call themselves “friends of the people” despite badly oppressing them. I believe that Jesus was making the point that even the rulers of this world recognize the eternal truth He was about to repeat, even while they refuse to follow it. Those who wish to be great must serve others. If you want to be a true leader of people find out what those you wish to lead need to be successful and provide them with it.

    A few days ago I came across a column which included some interesting thoughts on what Jesus meant in Luke 22:35-38. I have always struggled with what Jesus was saying when He told His disciples that if they should buy a sword if they did not have one. What made that confusing was that, when the disciples said they had two swords, Jesus said that was enough. The writer I read pointed out that Jesus followed up the instruction to buy a sword with the comment that He was going to be counted among the rebels. How could Jesus be a rebel leader if His followers were not armed? In that context, when Jesus responded that two swords were enough He was saying that they had missed the point; He could not lead a rebellion against Rome with twelve followers who only had two swords among them. He had no intent to set up the Kingdom of God by force of arms.

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Luke 19-20.

    I never before noticed that in Luke’s account of the story of the servants given money to invest on their master’s behalf all of the servants started with the same amount. The point is still much the same. However, this story focuses much more on what we do with the opportunities which God gives us and less on how gifted we were in the first place. The lesson from this story is very clear. The more we do with the gifts and opportunities which God gives us, the more we will have to do it with. If you are a gifted athlete and you work at your athleticism, you will become an even more gifted athlete. If you have opportunities to help those in need and you work hard to help them, you will have more opportunities to help those in need. Take the opportunities and gifts which you receive and make the most of them. When you do so, you will find yourself with even more opportunities and gifts.

    When the religious leaders asked Jesus by what authority He took the actions He took, it was an attempt to trap Him into saying something they could use to bring charges against Him. It was an attempt to get Jesus to say something which could be interpreted as a challenge to the authority of Rome. However, Jesus turned it back on them by asking them to either reject or support the ministry of John the Baptist. They were unwilling to do either because they had failed to do follow John’s teachings but to deny that John had divine inspiration would diminish them in the eyes of the crowd. However, they saw the trap Jesus had laid for them and tried to turn it on Him with their question about paying taxes to Caesar. Once again Jesus was able to turn their question back on them. They thought that they had trapped Jesus between declaring rebellion against Rome, by rejecting Rome’s power to tax, or angering the crowd, by supporting Rome’s authority to tax.
    In both of these cases, Jesus refused to allow His opponents to frame the debate. Instead, He framed the debate on other issues. In the first question, by asking them the basis for John’s authority, He made the question about what made someone or something an authority. In the second question, on the issue of taxation, He changed the question to a question of where your loyalty lies. There are many intricacies to Jesus answer, but the most basic understanding would not have been missed by anyone present. The coins had Caesar’s image on them. Everyone present would have been aware that in Genesis it declared that each and every one of us has God’s image on useach and every one of us has God’s image on us.

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Luke 17-18.

    This is another passage packed with teachings to which we would do well to pay close heed. The first bit is a series of passages about exercising and increasing our faith. Jesus warns us that we will be tempted, but that we must strive to avoid being the source of temptation. Encouraging, both passively and actively, others to sin is just as much of a sin as any other. Immediately following that, both in the passage and as a matter of doctrine, is the teaching that when we see a fellow believer sin we should confront them about that sin (Matthew 18 expounds more thoroughly on this). The key element here is that, if our fellow believer repents we must forgive them, even if they continue to do so. One might question whether they truly repent id they continue to repeat the sin, but that is an issue for another day. The important thing here is that we are to forgive time after time. The final piece in this paragraph is Jesus’ teaching on how to grow our faith. Reading this instruction runs counter to our modern culture. If we want to grow our faith we need to do the things which we know God wants us to do, one after another, with no expectation of positive feedback. When we receive recognition for doing God’s will we should view it as a bonus, not as our due. The way to build our faith is to do as I noted yesterday, consider doing God’s will to be our reward for doing God’s will.

    There are three more things in this passage that I want to touch on. These are not as closely tied together as the things from my previous paragraph. Jesus tells us two important facts about His return and the end of the world. His return will not be announced in advance. We may, and should, be expecting it, but there will be no warning. On the other hand, when it happens it will not be a secret. Everyone will know. You will not need to wait for the announcement on the news, or over Twitter, or some other media. When Jesus returns everyone will see it for themselves.
    I originally intended to put all three of these teachings in one paragraph, but realized I could not tie the second two into the previous one. Jesus teaches that we should be persistent in our prayer. It occurs to me to link that persistence with the teaching which immediately followed, humbly acknowledging our sin to God. We should continue to present our requests to God until He has satisfied them. However, as we do so we should also acknowledge ourselves as sinners, undeserving of God’s great love.

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Luke 14-16.

    As I was reading the passage today and came to the parable of the great feast I saw it in a completely different light. Here in Luke this parable immediately follows Jesus’ teaching about throwing parties for those who cannot throw parties to invite you to in return. I think that because it is similar to the parable of the wedding feast in Matthew we tend to read some of the meaning of that parable into this one. In light of the previous few verses, and other teachings of Jesus presented by Luke, it strikes me that we receive our invitations to God’s great feast when we have opportunities to help others. How often do we pass on the opportunity to help those in need because we are busy with something else? More importantly, do we recognize the blessings we are foregoing when we do so? One of the things we often miss when we read the Gospels is that central to Jesus’ teachings was the idea that the reward for doing good was doing good. Or to phrase that another way, doing good is a blessing in and of itself.

    I am struggling to get my mind around all of my thoughts concerning the impetus we should have to bring a lost soul to God. The message contained here is why I am so hesitant to suggest that missionaries who spend years in a location with few, if any, converts should pull up stakes and find a new location for their mission. We should expend whatever resources necessary to bring to God those lost souls we encounter, and we should make life choices so that we encounter lost souls. However, in the parable of the rich man and Lazarus Jesus points out that there is a limit to what tactics are worth using. When the rich man asked Abraham to send Lazarus back to warn his brothers, Jesus tells us that Abraham replied that if they did not believe Moses and the prophets they would not believe someone returning from the dead. The lesson here is that those who demand proof of God’s existence will not accept any proof with which they are presented. Those who do not want to believe will find a reason to not believe.

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Luke 12-13.

    Jesus’ teachings in today’s passage are all closely related to each other. I may not touch on all of them, but I believe the theme is there on those as well. The passage starts out by warning us to be more afraid of God, who destroy our very selves, than of men, who, no matter how powerful, can only destroy our bodies. Yet, from there He points out that we are valuable to God, who cares about the lives of mere sparrows (which can be bought in numbers for mere pennies).

I am going to step away from my main theme to say something about blasphemy. It is one thing to deny that some particular person is a person of God, even if that person is Jesus Himself. However, calling good evil, and evil good is another matter entirely. When you start to call that which is clearly evil a good thing you begin moving into territory from which there is no return. I struggle with writing this in a way does not leave room for misinterpretation, but I have seen those who once knew the truth deny it in such a way that it is clear they will never accept it again.

    Having spoken about how much God values each individual one of us, Jesus goes on to tell a parable about a man who chose to expand how much wealth he could store. Jesus uses that parable as a jumping off point to advise us not to worry about how much wealth we have, to not even worry about whether we have enough for our next meal, to pay for a roof over our heads, or clothes to wear. Instead of saving our wealth we should invest it in doing good for others. By doing so we will be saving up heavenly wealth where it cannot be lost or stolen. God will provide for our needs, so we need not worry about how they will be met.

    The parable about the fig tree Jesus tells a short time later fits right in with this theme. God is looking for us to bear the fruit of our faith. In many ways this is an explanation about how to deal with feelings of depression and uselessness. It is God’s desire for everyone to come to Him, but His patience has limits. Our time to serve God will run out eventually. We need to take advantage of the opportunities to do good which present themselves to us because they may be the last that we will have.

I am using the daily Bible reading schedule from “The Bible.net” for my daily Bible reading.

Today, I am reading and commenting on Luke 10-11.

    This is the only place in the New Testament where we get an idea of the number of people who were following Jesus on a regular basis. Here Jesus chose 72 (or perhaps only 70, some manuscripts have the smaller number) out of a larger group of followers for a special mission. Jesus gave similar instructions previously when He sent out just the Twelve, but He goes into more detail here (or, at least, Luke recounts more detail here). I think we should take note that Jesus instructed the 72 not to spend time in towns which did not welcome them. This teaching is definitely one we should keep in mind when missionaries go forth to preach the Gospel, but I am hesitant to make too much of it because of the stories I have heard and read of missionaries who spent years with little to show for it, where suddenly something changed and the floodgates opened and people began to accept the message.

    The story of the Good Samaritan and Jesus’ teaching on prayer are important to read, but I am going to finish up by talking about Jesus’ criticism of religious teachers. We should interpret this passage in light of the story of the Good Samaritan a few verse earlier. For that matter, we should interpret this in light of the other things in between that story and this account. There are at least two aspects of Jesu’s condemnation of the religious teachers. First He condemns them for showy acts of righteousness performed for public acclaim. They did things which could be measured and which would cause others to be praise them and hold them up for acclamation. On the other hand, they could not be bothered with actions which, while they would help others, would not benefit themselves. The second aspect concerned identifying sins without taking any action to help the individual overcome the sin. An example I would give of this sort of behavior would be the anti-prostitution crusader who spends lots of time in front of the camera declaring how terrible prostitution is without spending any time helping those who practice prostitution find another way to support themselves.